McGovern's Stupidity

George McGovern is spouting his left-wing politics again. In a recent adition of the LA Times he has said that the US should surrender in Iraq! That, is not only incredibly stupid but also dangerous. There is no way we can surrender in this fight. The reprecussions would be absolutlely devasting. If we were to do so it would show to the terrorists that we are weak and cannot commit to fighting terrorism. That would invite numerous dangers in the forms of more attacks on our interests abroad and at home. I expect more out of MrMcGovern. He should know the intracacies of such national security matters, after all he did run for President. To read about these comments and the Democrats leftward leaning politics. you can go here. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/12/27/154529.shtml

And here is the text of the letter:

To the Editor,

I'm for keeping Donald H. Rumsfeld as secretary of defense because he is against increasing the number of American soldiers in Iraq. Sending more soldiers only means more targets for those Iraqis who don't want our army occupying their country.

I did not want any Americans to risk their lives in Iraq. We should bring home those who are there. So better Mr. Rumsfeld than some eager beaver who wants to double our army in the desert as we repeatedly did in the jungle to no avail in the 1960's and 70's. We toppled Saddam Hussein; as George Aiken, that wonderful old Republican senator, said of an earlier time of troubles, Declare victory and come home.

Once we left Vietnam and quit bombing its people, they became friends and trading partners. Iraq has been nestled along the Tigris and Euphrates for 6,000 years. It will be there 6,000 more whether we stay or leave, as earlier conquerors learned.

I tried to persuade Santa Claus to bring our troops home for Christmas, but he said, "No, Rumsfeld sees light at the end of the tunnel if we hang in there and don't listen to old veterans like McGovern."

Is there really a Santa Claus, Virginia? If so, why were 14 soldiers killed at lunch after a hard night searching for that light at the end of the tunnel?

George McGovernMitchell, S.D., Dec. 22, 2004

Merry Christmas!

I just wanted to wish everyone a very Merry Christmas! I hope everyone got what they wanted, but most importantly is the fact that we should be grateful this Christmas for the people and organizations that are so staunchly defending Christmas. Thank you.

Invasion of the Scrooges

Christmas is under attack! Red alert!

The symbols of Christmas, religious and otherwise are under assault from secularist media and courts. This holiday season there has been more requests to take down or rename Christmas Trees "Holiday Trees," people suing over nativity scenes, schools not singing traditional Christmas music, things have gone chaotic. Secularists want to abolish Christmas from the public arena and will stop at nothing to do it, even if it happens slowly. Most people, liberal and conservative alike, enjoy the holiday season, it is only the far left whom feel it is their duty to do this. And it not only affects Christian symbols, but also Jewish, for manorahs are also being banned from being displayed. Who do these judges think they are? Have they lost the meaning of the holiday season? I love this time of year, the music, movies, etc. Where are the Spirits of Christmas Past, Present and Future when you need them?

President George W. Bush Time's Person of the Year

Time Magazine has just named President George W. Bush as their Person of the Year. I think he deserves this honor for a number of reasons, which I will go into here.

First of all the President has succeeded in winning reelection against Senator John Kerry who ran a tough campaign. Through surrogates he relentlessly attacked the president's policies and even indulging in personal attacks. For the president to be able to reach out to the American people is but one reason I, personally feel he should be the Person of the Year.

Another reason is, and this reason is one liberals will argue about, is through the invasion of Iraq last spring, he has given the people of that once oppressed country a chance at freedom and democracy. In January the people will get to hold elections for the possibly the first time in modern history. This would not have happened if not the courage of George W. Bush. Now Iraq will get a chance to be free and not under the oppressive yoke of Saddam Hussein, and more so free people are less likely to act out in violent ways.

President George W. Bush, love him or hate him, has stood up for what he believes in and his foreign policy has and will have an everlasting affect on not only our country but the world, and in my honest opinion it will be for the better.

Minorities in the Bush cabinet

As of yesterday President Bush names Carlos Guiterrez as his new Secretary of Commerce hence replacing Don Evans. This is only the latest instance of the President giving high positions to minorities. The other cases would be Alberto Gonzalez being named as Attorney General and Condoleeza Rice being moved from being the National Security Advisor to Secretary of State. I'm personally very happy with this development since I am half Mexican. I think all minorities should be invited in to the tent of the administration. It goes to show that everyone and anyone can have the opportunity to move upward in life even into the halls of American power. This country should be a happy about this and not accuse the President of doing for political reasons.